Is it...
...the idea behind an image?
...the skill which goes into capturing it?
...the quality of a photograph?
Is there even an answer?
Recently there's been an art movement called "iPhoneography" or "
It's almost insulting, to people like me, who own expensive cameras, read books on photography, and have practiced for years in hopes of mastering the art. And I'm nowhere near the skill level of professional photographers, many of whom studied photography in school and worked hard to get into the profession.
The thing that bothers me the most, is... I kind of like some of the
But here's a question to ponder...
Who's the artist behind iPhoneography? Is it the iPhotographer? or is it the people who designed the apps?
Photography in general is much easier and more accessible now than it was 50-100 years ago. The process of capturing and developing an image used to be much more difficult. Last December I had the opportunity of visiting the Musée Orangerie in Paris. During that time the museum was displaying photography by Heinrich Kühn, an Austrian photographer around the turn of the century. Looking at his work and reading about the methods he used in capturing and developing his images made me reflect on how much skill went into producing each photograph back then compared to how photography is today. On the other hand, advancements in
Who's to say one method of photography is better than another? And who am I to say that iPhoneography isn't a real form of art?
Regardless, I have created a tumblr intended to mock the iPhoneography art movement. The idea is that you can take any image (even crappy
So here it is: Instagram-it and call it art. Enjoy. And feel free to submit your iPhoneography images of random, ordinary objects as well.